Oral Testosterone

Oral Native Testosterone Does Not Suppress HPTA Function: Evidence from Clinical Practice

Abstract

  • Background: Traditional testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) can boost testosterone levels, but it often comes at the cost of shutting down the body’s own hormone production. This includes reducing key fertility signals like LH and FSH. Oral native testosterone may offer a different approach, using a unique absorption pathway and natural (unmodified) testosterone to avoid this problem.

  • Objective: We wanted to see whether oral native testosterone could raise testosterone levels while still allowing the body to produce its own LH and FSH, which would suggest that natural hormone and fertility signaling remained intact.

  • Methods: We looked at clinical data from men with symptoms of low testosterone who were treated with daily oral native testosterone monotherapy (without enclomiphene), taken with dietary fat to help absorption. Blood tests before and after treatment measured testosterone, LH, FSH, SHBG, and estradiol levels.

  • Results: After treatment, all patients maintained LH and FSH levels above thresholds considered important for fertility. Testosterone levels increased significantly, and patients reported noticeable improvements in energy, mood, strength, libido, and overall quality of life.

  • Conclusion: Unlike traditional TRT, oral native testosterone improved hormone levels without shutting down the body’s natural production and fertility signals. This suggests it may work more like a daily supplement to support hormone balance, rather than replacing the body’s own system entirely. This opens up a promising option for men who want the benefits of testosterone without compromising fertility.

0
%

Average increase in free testosterone levels

0
%

Maintenance of fertility-related hormone markers within normal ranges

0
%

Of patients reported improvements in libido and erectile function

0
%

Of patients reported better quality of life, including energy, mood, and daily wellbeing

Background

Traditional testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis (HPTA), leading to impaired gonadotropin release and potential loss of fertility. The HPTA is the central hormonal feedback loop that regulates testosterone production. The hypothalamus releases GnRH, which stimulates the pituitary to secrete LH and FSH. These gonadotropins act on the testes to produce testosterone and support spermatogenesis. Exogenous testosterone disrupts this loop by signaling to the brain that levels are sufficient, shutting down natural production.1 While effective at increasing serum testosterone, injectable and transdermal formulations often reduce luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to undetectable levels. As shown in prior studies, even modest doses of exogenous testosterone are associated with marked suppression of gonadotropins.2

Oral native testosterone (unesterified and absorbed via the lymphatic system) offers a potential alternative. Like testosterone undecanoate, it bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism through lymphatic absorption. However, its native (non-esterified) form likely allows for more rapid absorption and systemic availability, as it does not require enzymatic cleavage before becoming active.

Objective

This retrospective analysis aimed to determine whether oral native testosterone monotherapy could improve testosterone levels while preserving gonadotropin production. We focused on whether patients maintained LH and FSH levels within normal ranges after treatment, which would indicate preserved HPTA function.

Methods

We reviewed clinical data from 34 male patients treated with oral native testosterone monotherapy. All patients had paired hormone panels before and after treatment. Inclusion required both symptomatic hypogonadism, based on a combination of testosterone levels and low qADAM scores.3 Patients using enclomiphene or other hormonal agents were excluded.

Patients took 600 mg of native oral testosterone daily with a minimum of 30 g dietary fat to ensure lymphatic absorption. Lymphatic absorption refers to the transport of lipophilic compounds through intestinal lymph vessels instead of blood capillaries. This route bypasses the liver initially, allowing compounds like testosterone to enter systemic circulation directly. Dietary fat stimulates this process by triggering chylomicron formation, which packages and transports the testosterone through the lymphatic system.4 This dosing protocol aimed to balance patient compliance with optimal pharmacokinetic performance, as dietary fat significantly influences testosterone absorption.5

Hormone panels included total testosterone, calculated free testosterone (via the Vermeulen equation), LH, FSH, SHBG, and estradiol. Paired t-tests were used to assess changes, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results

All 34 patients maintained LH and FSH levels above 2.0 mIU/mL following oral native testosterone monotherapy. This threshold is commonly accepted as sufficient for fertility. The average post-treatment LH was 7.9 ± 4.6 mIU/mL and FSH was 6.7 ± 3.1 mIU/mL, demonstrating preserved gonadotropin production across the cohort. No patients experienced suppression below any clinical cutoffs, including those who reached supraphysiologic testosterone levels.

Table 1

Gonadotropin Status at Follow-Up

Threshold (mIU/mL)
LH n (%)
FSH n (%)
Clinical Interpretation
>1.5
34 (100%)
34 (100%)
Conservative fertility preservation level
>2.0
34 (100%)
34 (100%)
Standard lab reference range

Free testosterone rose from 86.0 ± 40.4 pg/mL to 197.6 ± 96.5 pg/mL, a 129.8% increase (p < 0.001). SHBG declined significantly by 24% (p < 0.001), contributing to the enhanced bioavailability of free testosterone. LH and FSH showed small nonsignificant decreases but remained within physiological ranges. Total testosterone also increased from 453.9 ± 178.0 ng/dL to 790.1 ± 313.8 ng/dL, a 74% increase (p < 0.001).

"No patients experienced suppression below any clinical cutoffs, including those who reached supraphysiologic testosterone levels."

Table 2

Hormonal Changes Following Oral Native Testosterone Monotherapy (Table 2)

Parameter
Baseline (Mean ± SD)
Follow-up (Mean ± SD)
Absolute Change
Relative Change (%)
p-value
LH (mIU/mL)
8.8 ± 5.7
7.9 ± 4.6
-0.8 ± 4.9
-10.2
0.32
FSH (mIU/mL)
7.5 ± 5.1
6.7 ± 3.1
-0.9 ± 3.9
-10.75
0.21
Free Testosterone (pg/mL)
86.0 ± 40.4
197.6 ± 96.5
+111.5 ± 93.5
+129.8
< 0.001
SHBG (nmol/L)
40.8 ± 23.1
31.0 ± 16.4
-9.8 ± 15.3
-24
< 0.001
Total Testosterone (ng/dL)
453.9 ± 178.0
790.1 ± 313.8
+336.1 ± 255.1
+74
< 0.001
Estradiol (pg/mL)
24.8 ± 8.5
23.7 ± 10.1
-1.1 ± 9.4
-4.4
0.51

When benchmarked against NHANES reference data for lean, healthy, non-smoking men aged 19 to 40, patients shifted from the 26th to the 87th percentile in total testosterone, and from the 11th to the 95th percentile in free testosterone.6

Table 3

Percentile Rank Improvements in T and Free T

Hormone
Baseline Percentile
Post-Treatment Percentile
Total Testosterone
26th
87th
Free Testosterone
11th
95th

Further analysis showed that 62 percent of patients had lower estradiol at follow-up despite increased testosterone levels, and 76 percent experienced a reduction in SHBG. There was no meaningful correlation between the magnitude of testosterone increase and change in estradiol levels (p=0.65).

Patients also reported substantial improvements in quality of life, based on the validated qADAM questionnaire. 94% of participants experienced an increase in their overall composite score. These improvements reached statistical significance across every domain. Physical symptoms such as energy, strength, and athletic performance improved in more than 90% of participants. Sexual function, including libido and erectile quality, improved in over 97%. Measures of mental well-being such as happiness and life enjoyment showed similar gains, with the majority of patients reaching scores consistent with normal function. Improvements in daily function were also notable. All patients reported a reduction in excessive sleepiness after dinner, and more than 94% reported enhanced work performance. These changes were statistically significant across all symptom categories, with p-values ranging from < 0.001 to < 0.05.

Table 4

qADAM Symptom Improvements Following Oral Native Testosterone Monotherapy

Question
Symptom Improvement
% With Improvement
Significance (p-value)
qADAM 1
Libido
97.10%
< 0.001
qADAM 2
Energy
94.10%
< 0.001
qADAM 3
Strength / Endurance
91.20%
< 0.05
qADAM 4
Life Enjoyment
94.10%
< 0.05
qADAM 5
Happiness
88.20%
< 0.05
qADAM 6
Erections
97.00%
< 0.001
qADAM 7
Work Performance
94.10%
< 0.01
qADAM 8
Fall Asleep After Dinner
100.00%
< 0.01
qADAM 9
Sports Ability
94.10%
< 0.001
qADAM Composite
Quality of Life
94.40%
< 0.001

About the Authors

  • Gabriel Alizaidy, MD, MS

    Gabriel leads Clinical Research & Development at Maximus Labs, where he focuses on advancing men’s health through research in hormone optimization, precision protocols, and real-world clinical outcomes.

  • Cameron Sepah, PhD

    Cameron is a Clinical Psychologist, Assistant Clinical Professor at UCSF, and CEO of Maximus. His work bridges psychology, physiology, and digital health to help high performers optimize their health, mindset, and daily functioning.

  • R. Starling Krentz, MS

    Starling is a Clinical Research Coordinator at Maximus Labs, where he oversees protocol execution and data management.

Testosterone Support

Boost your performance and energy with Oral Testosterone

Get Started

References

  1. Bhattacharya I, Dey S, Banerjee A. Revisiting the gonadotropic regulation of mammalian spermatogenesis: evolving lessons during the past decade. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1110572. Published 2023 Apr 14. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1110572

  2. Masterson TA, Turner D, Vo D, et al. The Effect of Longer-Acting vs Shorter-Acting Testosterone Therapy on Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9(1):143-148. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.07.006
  3. Mohamed O, Freundlich RE, Dakik HK, et al. The quantitative ADAM questionnaire: a new tool in quantifying the severity of hypogonadism. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22(1):20-24. doi:10.1038/ijir.2009.35
  4. Trevaskis NL, Charman WN, Porter CJ. Lipid-based delivery systems and intestinal lymphatic drug transport: a mechanistic update. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(6):702-716. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.09.007
  5. Yin A, Alfadhli E, Htun M, et al. Dietary fat modulates the testosterone pharmacokinetics of a new self-emulsifying formulation of oral testosterone undecanoate in hypogonadal men. J Androl. 2012;33(6):1282-1290. doi:10.2164/jandrol.112.017020
  6. Platz EA, Barber JR, Chadid S, et al. Nationally Representative Estimates of Serum Testosterone Concentration in Never-Smoking, Lean Men Without Aging-Associated Comorbidities. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(10):1759-1770. doi:10.1210/js.2019-00151
  7. Sepah SC, Alizaidy G, Henry H, Boerger N. Maximus’ Oral TRT Plus Protocol: a highly efficacious and non-suppressive approach to significantly enhance testosterone and quality of life in hypogonadal and eugonadal men. Maximus; 2025.
  8. Goldman AL, Bhasin S, Wu FCW, Krishna M, Matsumoto AM, Jasuja R. A Reappraisal of Testosterone's Binding in Circulation: Physiological and Clinical Implications. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(4):302-324. doi:10.1210/er.2017-00025
  9. Azzouni F, Godoy A, Li Y, Mohler J. The 5 alpha-reductase isozyme family: a review of basic biology and their role in human diseases. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:530121. doi:10.1155/2012/530121